Introduction
As the prevalence of dementia rises globally, the safety of persons with dementia (PWD) in community settings becomes increasingly critical. A recent study titled Persons with dementia missing in the community: Is it wandering or something unique? challenges the conventional understanding of wandering and missing incidents. This blog aims to guide practitioners in enhancing their skills by integrating these research findings into practice.
Key Findings from the Study
The study, conducted by Rowe et al. (2011), distinguishes between the concepts of wandering and missing incidents. The researchers analyzed 325 newspaper reports of PWD missing in the community, identifying key characteristics and antecedents of missing incidents.
- Distinct Characteristics: Missing incidents are unpredictable, non-repetitive, and occur during normal activities, unlike the repetitive and temporally-disordered nature of wandering.
- Antecedents: The primary antecedent is becoming lost during a routine, unsupervised activity. Lapses in supervision also contribute significantly.
- Outcomes: Those found deceased were often located in secluded areas, suggesting the need for rapid response strategies.
Implications for Practitioners
Understanding the differences between wandering and missing incidents can significantly impact intervention strategies. Here are some actionable steps for practitioners:
- Educate Caregivers: Highlight the importance of supervision during routine activities and the use of identification systems like MedicAlert SafeReturn™.
- Implement Locating Technologies: Encourage the use of radiofrequency identification systems for rapid location of missing individuals.
- Conduct Wayfinding Assessments: Regularly assess the wayfinding abilities of PWD to anticipate potential missing incidents.
Encouraging Further Research
While this study provides valuable insights, further research is necessary to refine intervention strategies. Practitioners are encouraged to explore the nuances of missing incidents and contribute to the development of evidence-based practices.
Conclusion
The distinction between wandering and missing incidents is crucial for developing targeted interventions that enhance the safety and well-being of PWD. By integrating these research findings into practice, practitioners can play a pivotal role in improving outcomes for individuals and their families.
To read the original research paper, please follow this link: Persons with dementia missing in the community: Is it wandering or something unique?
